[FT] Forum for Christian Friends
Lee_Nichols at verizon.net
Mon Apr 17 18:22:24 PDT 2017
Hello Bill, It is good to hear from you and see you still have a passion for revival. I believe I share most of your concerns about various Quaker communities. For me, I would add most or all Christian communities. Perhaps this suggests a difficult person who is offensive to others. The confusing situation among Christian assemblies leaves me wondering how my life can be invested productively in my “mature” years especially among Quakers. I think there has to be some new form to allow the Spirit to breathe; one that provides an adequate and effective structure as Fox said to have Christ teach the people himself. This is the simple but also complex task that takes more energy, patience, love and endurance than gathering people for a “worship’ service on special days rather than developing an assembly that obeys the Spirit every day.
Bill, I am glad you wrote me in April rather than May because Verizon is dropping their email service so my only email address will be LNICHOLS29 at GMAIL.COM <mailto:LNICHOLS29 at GMAIL.COM>. I don’t know how much I will be able to contribute to a revived Quaker dialogue. I commend you for your effort and hope it succeeds.
May you be filled with the power of the Spirit as you carry out your mission to Friends,
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 11:25 AM, William F Rushby <wfrushby at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello, F-T!
> This is an attempt to revive dialogue on Friends-Theology. I know of no other discussion list for Christian Friends which cuts across denominational boundaries. I am not personally computer-savvy enough to start a new list, and some would regard me as too extreme (you know that people will believe almost any myth if it serves their purposes to do so) to be a list host anyway. Furthermore, Quaker-W, which catered to Conservative/Wilburite Friends, also got decommissioned, leaving us high and dry!
> If no one else can think of appropriate subject matter, I invite your attention to the 2013 issue of *Quaker Religious Thought*. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt/vol123/iss1/ <http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt/vol123/iss1/>
> I wrote the paper on Conservative Friends and could have written much more on the subject, without transgressing ingroup norms or revealing closely held secrets! For example, space limitations prevented me from discussing such topics as the problem of ministry among Conservative Friends.
> As it was, some Friends found my remarks deeply offensive. My paper was not intended to be an ingroup propaganda piece, but neither did I intend to offend unnecessarily. There are those, of course, who would regard anything I write as offensive. I wouldn't know how to satisfy such persons without indulging in outright prevarication.
> I hope you are still there and interested in reviving the dialogue.
> Bill Rushby
> Friends-Theology mailing list
> Friends-Theology at lists.quakerchristian.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Friends-Theology